Search for: "All Unknown Persons Claiming an Interest in the Property"
Results 601 - 620
of 740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Patents are supposed to be a form of property. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
Rajaratnam claimed that he pieced together information from a variety of sources to reach a decision on investing. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:52 am
It looks like the vagaries of Pennsylvania law may have made it harder to bring a conversion claim based on the phone number (the court footnotes that conversion claims are limited to tangible personal property), but at least one court has held that phone numbers can be subject to conversion claims. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:56 am
Sun Street Properties Ltd v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 72 (Dec) [no transcript available yet]Or, what the hell is going on about Occupy/Bank of Ideas and the property owned by Union Bank of Switzerland. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:17 am
Legal – For Targets with significant patents, trademarks and other intellectual property, the Buyer will sometimes engage a specialist consultant to help with analysis of such intellectual property. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
Artists’ human rights are transcendent and timeless expressions of fundamental entitlements of humanity that safeguard the personal link between authors and their creations as well as their basic material interests. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
However, any compensation a spouse receives for personal injuries is not considered marital property and is not subject to equitable distribution. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Section 6311, which requires: A person who, in the course of employment, occupation or practice of a profession, comes into contact with children shall report or cause a report to be made in accordance with section 6313 (relating to reporting procedure) when the person has reasonable cause to suspect, on the basis of medical, professional or other training and experi [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
However, any compensation a spouse receives for personal injuries is not considered marital property and is not subject to equitable distribution. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
The issue in Turner was whether state-funded lawyers were required before a person could, at the behest of the child’s custodian, be incarcerated for contempt for failure to pay child support. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
It was also not a seizure, because “[a]lthough the can may have contained an unknown and unwanted foreign object, it cannot be said that anyone’s possessory interest was interfered with in a meaningful way. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:08 pm
That gives the informant a personal stake in seeing Bout convicted. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
We have the answer, whether wittingly or not, from Bishop Henderson's statements: it was the "serious" charges of abandonment by then brought to the Board by unknown (and unforthcoming) persons in the geographical territory of the Diocese of South Carolina, whether communicants of that Diocese or not. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
The charge of Grand Theft Motor Vehicle consists of three elements: 1) the Defendant knowingly and unlawfully obtained or used the property of the victim; 2) he or she did so with the intent to either temporary or permanently deprive the victim of his or her right to the property; or to appropriate the property of the victim to his or her own use or to the use of any person not entitled to it; and 3) the property was a motor vehicle. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
DEE AND ALL OTHER PERSONS UNKNOWN, claiming or who might claim any right, title, estate, or interest in, or lien or encumbrance upon, the real property described in the Complaint or any thereof, adverse to the Plaintiff’s ownership, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
’” These potential misrepresentations are certainly a core claim in the stockholder suit filed against Google in San Diego. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
That was all free. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
S. 465 (1926): “It is not unknown or indeed uncommon for the law to visit upon the owner of property the unpleasant consequences of the unauthorized action of one to whom he has entrusted it. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
An interesting claim construction issue over a wafer being wafers is walked all over by the CAFC extending the § 102(b) on-sale bar to cover eventual invention. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:43 am
She would also be personally very interested in hearing from anyone who has successfully navigated the new guidelines, and who has had a chemical selection patent granted at the UKIPO. [read post]
