Search for: "American President Lines v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 1,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Melissa Stewart
Though it is not a state party to UNCLOS, the United States submitted a written statement “in its capacity as a Member State of the United Nations” in the only advisory opinion decided by the full tribunal to date. [read post]
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
Its “customers” are other elements of the United States government that rely on its surveillance. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:27 am by Ralph Behr, Esq
”  Is that protected political speech or a threat to kill the President of the United States? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Why the Hobby Lobby Reasoning Is Dangerous to Hobby Lobby’s Bottom Line and to the United States The Hobby Lobby reasoning is also a hazard for for-profit companies, as Chick-Fil-A has learned the hard way. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:59 am by Steve Lubet
  Judge Higginbotham's measured words have provided wise guidance to United States judges ever since, and they are well worth remembering now. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
  Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Christopher Fonzone
  Jimmy Carter's administration exemplifies a recurring pattern in John Gans’s new book, "White House Warriors: How the National Security Council Transformed the American Way of War. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Vanessa Sauter shared the Lawfare Podcast, in which Steve Vladeck and Scott Anderson discuss the complexities of United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
They have developed positions on a number of issues.CECC tends to serve as an excellent barometer of the thinking of political and academic elites in the United States about issues touching on China and the official American line developed in connection with those issues. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  In contrast, the United States did not even begin scheduled air mail service until 1918. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:18 pm
United States, No. 11-182, presumably because she had worked on it as President Obama's solicitor general. [read post]