Search for: "Application of Barrett"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,025
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am
The nine-page, 8-0 decision, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the court and Justice Amy Coney Barrett not participating, reverses judgments of the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
Referencing an opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett from her time on the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:00 am
Simply arguing that he would apply, without any references to past applications or efforts to determine when a vacancy might open up, is not enough, Breyer reasoned. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:57 am
. ____ (2020), with new justice Amy Coney Barrett siding with the majority. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
See, among other things, then-Judge Barrett's dissent in a recent case from Seventh Circuit. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
And Van Buren urges the court to adopt his construction to avoid constitutional questions that flow from the Due Process Clause and First Amendment and in adherence to the rule of lenity, which counsels leniency in the application of ambiguous criminal statutes. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
This decades-long split has resulted in inconsistent application of the statute and arguably encourages forum shopping. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Barrett’s confirmation shows there is now a court majority that recognizes religious rights are worthy of constitutional protection, too. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:36 am
The newest Justice, Amy Coney Barrett, voted with the majority. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 4:42 am
If the governor does reinstate the numerical restrictions the applicants can return to this court, and we could act quickly on their renewed applications. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
" Justice Barrett cast the deciding vote to render her former colleague's conclusion bad law. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:14 pm
Justice Barrett cast the deciding vote. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 3:24 pm
As a result, there will be no opportunity for Justice Barrett to opine on these cases. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
One reason is that constitutional cases are decided by the application of precedent, so justices are not free to vote their party line, as are members of Congress. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Emergency requests and applications for extensions from the 2nd Circuit will now go initially to Sotomayor instead. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:30 pm
Barrett cited her full participation in capital cases as a law clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia and as a judge on the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Supreme Court opinions and applications were searched from 2005 through the present for the term “election. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Even if the “mandate” is unconstitutional, it causes no injury to the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs accordingly lack standing to challenge it.Some of the Justices, however, seemed to disagree with what, until last week, would have been the straightforward application of decided case law. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” Barrett asked if such an agency would be “entitled to an exemption” and “if so, how is that distinguishable from . . . [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Justice Barrett may even grant a courtesy fifth. [read post]
