Search for: "Arkansas Supreme Court" Results 601 - 620 of 2,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
 Ninth Circuit (2020, en banc): The Montana Supreme Court says otherwise; the fossils instead belong to the ranchers. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:26 am by Kristian Soltes
Britain’s Supreme Court handed down a long-awaited ruling that the networks’ interchange schedules unlawfully restrict competition. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
” Indeed, prior to Little Rock, Eisenhower had been reluctant to lend federal muscle to desegregation efforts in the South in the years following the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
Arkansas (1995), the Supreme Court stated, “We simply hold that although a search or seizure of a dwelling might be constitutionally defective if police officers enter without prior announcement, law enforcement interests may also establish the reasonableness of an unannounced entry. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:34 pm by Mark Theodore, Joshua Fox and Eric Novak
NLRB Overturns Pacific Lutheran and Reaffirms Great Falls In Bethany College, the Board found that the Great Falls test – not Pacific Lutheran – was more faithful to the Supreme Court’s principles, as set forth in NLRB v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Connecticut 19-1010Issue: Whether, contrary to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b), the Supreme Court’s decisions and the decisions of five U.S. courts of appeals, a district court may compel a party that has not engaged in discovery-related misconduct to produce documents that are neither relevant nor responsive. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by Josh Blackman
I addressed the Supreme Court's recent decision involving the California church. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
It is a three-front battle, playing out in the courts, in federal and state Legislatures, and on the campaign trail. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:33 pm by Ilya Somin
I analyzed the federal Supreme Court decision here, and the most recent Indiana state supreme court decision here. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
Program in Agricultural and Food Law at the University of Arkansas School of Law. [read post]
16 May 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, it shows how the 'democratic' political party came to supplant the Supreme Court as the nation's preeminent constitutional institution.The book has been the subject of an excellent symposium over at Balkinization, with assessments by Greg Ablavsky (Stanford), Mary Bilder (Boston College), Jud Campbell (Richmond), Johnathan Gienapp (Stanford), Mark Graber (Maryland), Mark Killenbeck (Arkansas), and Sandy Levinson (Texas) and responses by the authors. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Clarence Thomas (whose seniority makes him an early questioner in the telephonic regime) seemed to think the actions Congress took to diminish the authority of the Creek Nation over eastern Oklahoma were much more substantial than the actions the Supreme Court considered in earlier cases that required explicit congressional action to disestablish a reservation (the most notable of which are Solem v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              What about the Supreme Court? [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court called for additional briefing on whether the court was authorized to settle a dispute about congressional subpoenas for President Trump’s financial records. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:14 pm by ACLU
We’ve filed multiple lawsuits against federal prisons, and at least 13 state affiliates have petitioned their state supreme courts for the release of individuals from jails and prisons. [read post]