Search for: "B. Campbell" Results 601 - 620 of 1,265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am by Sean Wajert
 Campbell then moved to dismiss the case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:03 am by Jon Hyman
I'm well aware that I write a lot about my daughter’s music, but I do so because (a) I know a lot you enjoy it, and (b) I’m a really proud dad. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The 14-day time period for Gomez to respond elapsed, and Campbell-Ewald then moved to dismiss the case under Rule12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing his claim had become moot because the offer provided him with complete relief, and therefore the class claims were moot as well. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:50 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Campbell then moved to dismiss the case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Could wrongly signal to authors that use of more than 10% would always be protected, but that wasn’t the 11thCircuit’s problem—held that improper even as a starting point, b/c case by case/work by work approach was required under Campbell. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am by Paul Karlsgodt
The burgeoning area of privacy class action litigation showed no signs of slowing down in 2015. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
That same day the County moved to dismiss Nissen's complaint under [Court Rules] 12(b)(6). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
Silicon Glen hereMonarch of the Glen here and hereGlen Campbell hereGlenn Miller here [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:25 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Background   Acciona entered into a contract to design and build a reinforced concrete structure as an addition to the existing hospital and hired Campbell Construction as the principal subcontractor to design and build the concrete framework and slabs. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
The Court finished up its October sitting yesterday, beginning with oral arguments in the class-action case Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]