Search for: "B. Parker" Results 601 - 620 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
It is sufficient for the claimant to be affected by the court's determination: see Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union[2009] EWCA Civ 387, [2010] 1 WLR 318 at [120] (Aikens LJ), Feetum v Levy [2005] EWCA Civ 1601, [2006] Ch 585 at [82] (Jonathan Parker LJ) and Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 270, [2012] 1 P&CR 3 at [44] (Mummery LJ). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:21 pm
(One person, Kenneth Parker, is under a military death sentence but is currently confined at Camp Lejeune.) [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:16 am
March 5, 2009) ("bald" manufacturing violation claim dismissed); Parker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Vázquez (Georgetown), Ingrid B. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Alex Phipps
Taking up defendant’s argument, the Court of Appeals first explained that G.S. 20-139.1(b)(1) makes breath tests admissible if they are “performed in accordance with the rules of the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
 [b]ut if that were the end of the § 101 inquiry, an applicant could claim any principle of the physical or social sciences by reciting a computer system configured to implement the relevant concept. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The policy also states that in determination the applicability of Exclusions (a) and (b), “the knowledge possessed by, or any Wrongful Act committee by, an Insured Person who is a past or current [chief executive officer] …shall be imputed to the Company. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 2:26 pm by Melanie Fontes
  The conscious consumer’s influence is reflected in the rise of B-corporations or “benefit corporations” such as Ben & Jerry’s, Patagonia, and The Body Shop. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
Parker, 136 Cal.App.4th 540, 548 (2006), which held that the bond requirement of Labor Code section 98.2(b) is merely "directory," instead of "mandatory and jurisdictional. [read post]