Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 3,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 4:54 pm
Remember that CAAF decided that very issue last term in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:17 pm
It's late and I'm very tired tonight, so I'll grab Judge Erdmann's helpful synopsis of his opinion of the court in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
Here is a jurisprudential penumbra zone.In the US, the Supreme Court will soon decide whether requiring a baker to design and make a cake that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about same-sex marriage violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:12 pm
Do you use Google or some other free internet service to quickly pull up state and federal cases (for free!)? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:57 pm by Mark Tushnet
According to Justice Kennedy in Masterpiece Cakeshop, the baker was "entitled to ... neutral and respectful consideration of his claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) O’Connell v Viridian Housing [2012] EWHC 1389 (QB) (25 May 2012) Lewis v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Ors [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB) (25 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v The Football League Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1372 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Shanmuganathan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
Justice Beth Baker of the Montana Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Yellowstone County District Court, which enjoined the three laws and granted a preliminary injunction as a violation of the state’s right to privacy. [read post]