Search for: "BISHOP v. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Hence, as Justice O'Connor put it in her concurrence in McCreary County, Ky. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:46 am by Anders Walker
  Currently in the news thanks to Fisher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
The Supreme Court confirmed vicarious liability of the Diocese of Saint George’s Newfoundland and Labrador for sexual abuse by Father Kevin Bennett stating: First, the bishop provided Bennett with the opportunity to abuse his power. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"The court erred in finding that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for legal [*2]malpractice as against Fogarty. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am by Frank Cranmer
Church and State On Friday, the House of Commons Library published a research briefing on The relationship between church and state in the United Kingdom written by David Torrance. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Board here was correct in finding broadcast-incidental copying engages the reproduction right, consistent with Bishop v. [read post]