Search for: "BROWNING v. YOUNG" Results 601 - 620 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 4:05 am by SHG
Across the country, local efforts are at last underway to integrate schools that remain profoundly segregated more than half a century after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Act 689 is Not Narrowly Tailored The Court first considers the Supreme Court's narrow-tailoring analysis in Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
The elders tended to marry woman after woman; and many of these “wives” were extremely young. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
"[28] Yet all these cases don't generally explain why they are departing from the norm applicable in other reputational risk cases (except insofar as some of the university cases suggest that young adults should get special protection beyond what older adults get[29]). [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
LSE’s Sonia Livingstone and Western Sydney University’s Amanda Third have prepared a special issue of New Media and Society: Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
New.co,au reports reports that actor Craig McLachlan is suing former Rocky Horror Picture Show co-star Christie Whelan Browne over accusations of sexual harassment. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
Browning Editor’s note: The following story is reprinted with permission from the Fall 2013 Texas Entertainment and Sports Law Journal. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
It's modeled largely off what Steve Sachs and Ernie Young did at Duke, as well as what Judge Katsas and Alida Kass are doing at George Washington. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm by Mark Walsh
” “Wow,” says a young woman in the front row of the public gallery, in a loud whisper. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada The Toronto Star had a piece “Patrick Brown tries new tactic to block defamation lawsuit filed by Tory MPP Fedeli. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The result was that Ontario law was applied to this analysis.[11] On the question of unconscionability the Supreme Court followed its prior guidance that “arguments over any potential unfairness resulting from the enforcement of arbitration clauses contained in standard form contracts are better dealt with directly through the doctrine of unconscionability”.[12] The Supreme Court described the doctrine as follows:[13] Unconscionability is an equitable doctrine that is used to set aside… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]