Search for: "BUFFALO v. BUFFALO"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 5:34 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:18 am
It’s the argument they used to successfully attack the ACA’s original Medicaid expansion in the constitutional challenge they filed almost exactly seven years ago, NFIB v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:30 am
The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
It is well-established that a private entity has an ability to make “choices about whether, to what extent, and in what manner it will disseminate speech…” NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:09 pm
Cuomo started an initiative to develop the Buffalo, New York area. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of reemployment… [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
In the Buffalo Law Journal, Jeremy Oczek summarizes the legal issues in, and industries affected by, three intellectual property law cases pending before the Court this Term: (1) Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Who were Executed for the Murder of John Love, at Buffalo, N.Y., June 17, 1825 1st ed. 1 v. (1825?). [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of… [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 2:10 pm
Case Name: JT v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
As someone who frequently writes about mass incarceration, I was relieved when the Supreme Court released its opinion in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
P. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
FTC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
Applying the rule of three in selecting candidates on an eligible list for appointmentHatala v McCaul, App. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:52 pm
v=Q5hn8bhEpMY -- but good idea? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
UNITE HERE Local 100 v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Grisworld v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:39 am
Here are some of its concluding paragraphs:Unlike in State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:23 am
Ruby of Goddard, Wages & Vogel, Buffalo, Wyoming. [read post]
