Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 1,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Elena Chachko
The Israeli security forces suspected that Abu Gosh served as the explosives expert for an active Hamas unit in the West Bank city of Nablus. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
  Section 2333 reads, in relevant part, as follows: Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
”  Granted, not all data is covered by the European Directive (bank transfers and hotel bookings, for example, are excluded), but about 4500 companies nevertheless rely on the safe harbor framework to transfer commercial data from Europe to the United States. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  (In actuality broad legislative latitude was assumed and relied upon by Congress stretching back far further, at least until 1887, when the Interstate Commerce Commission was created, or to George Washington’s first term, when the first National Bank of the United States was enacted.) [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Case examples include an employee who used customer credit card information to go on elaborate spending sprees (United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:07 am by Brandon Kain
First, the approach taken in Canadian Solar stands in sharp contrast to the one taken by the United States Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]