Search for: "Bill Reynolds"
Results 601 - 620
of 804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
Among the suggestions were a compensation scheme, some chance to sue the government for damages in a special claims court, and possibly bills in Congress to provide individual compensation to the detainees. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
When this point is reached, the Reynolds privilege converges with the Totten bar…. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:49 am
Via Glenn Reynolds, this Matt Welch piece from the libertarian Reason magazine gave me a chuckle: The Death of Neoliberalism Pro-market Democrats disappeared just when we needed them most [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:14 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 537 F.3d 1357, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
Brandeis School of Law; Professor Carol Pauli, Loyola University New Orleans College of Law; Professor Glenn Reynolds, The University of Tennessee College of Law; Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
It is interesting to consider clauses 1(5) and (6) of Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill in the light of this analysis. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 10:52 pm
The approach in Reynolds, which was the basis for Anthony Lester’s Private Members Bill, is to focus on the conduct of the author or publisher of the libel in order to determine whether they qualify for the ‘privilege’ of publishing untruths. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:19 pm
I’ve turned off comments just twice in the five year history of the blog – once during the presidential elections because of some pretty hateful stuff that was aimed at other readers and commenters (which I absolutely won’t allow) and once during the discussion about the health care bill (for the same reason). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am
This was the first time a British national newspaper had succeeded in the Reynolds defence. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
But they make a strong case that something is deeply wrong with law schools.Their complaint is that non-elite law schools are selling a fraudulent bill of goods. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Nonetheless it did not recommend pure codification of Reynolds (p,26): it recommended further work by the Ministry of Justice on whether it is possible to reconcile the competing rights to reputation and freedom of expression in a way which clarified Reynolds in the light of (Mohammed) Jameel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Reynolds and Jameel – the existing law Before examining the proposals in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill it is perhaps worth summarising shortly the existing state of the Reynolds common law defence. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 am
For progress of Bill in parliament, see here. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
Thirdly, it seems to us unlikely that the result would have been any different if, instead of applying the common law as found in Reynolds and Jameel, the court has applied the approach set out in clause 1 of Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:44 am
The Explanatory Notes give no hint as to why certain Reynolds factors such as “notification” and “tone” have been omitted. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
The relation to Reynolds is minimal; the revision is not merely technical. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
“This is a bill made to pass. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
There have been Parliamentary debates and government consultations on the subject and there is now a Defamation Reform Bill, sponsored by Lord Lester of Herne Hill, before Parliament. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
If Insurance Commissioner Donelon or reporter Dan Reynolds attended these type of meetings, they would hear numerous examples of delayed and inept claims handling. [read post]
