Search for: "Board v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 27,981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2022, 8:37 am
(Application for discharge from jurisdiction of Psychiatric Security Review Board); State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
United States to modify and clarify the Board’s views on proper application of... [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am
Amending the description and claim-like clausesThe EPO Guidelines for Examination currently require that, when adapting the description, an applicant must either delete subject matter not covered by the claims or explicitly state in the description that such subject matter is not part of the invention (F-IV, 4.3). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
V. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
The Board responds, in part, by citing the Court’s statement in Town of Hallie v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:24 pm
A recent Reviewing Board Decision, Breire v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Here is the opinion in State of Alaska v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
The only case on which the board could try to hang its hat is the bizarre outlier - Caudillo v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:05 pm
Cor Route 5 Company LLC v Village of Fayetteville, 2017 WL 460613 (NYAD 4 Dept. 2/3/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review, Ripeness, Zoning-Adopting/Amending [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
State Personnel Bd. (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1169, 1175.) [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
Board of Education? [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:44 pm
State v Vaughn In arguing that he had ineffective trial counsel, Vaughn stated that his attorney should not have requested consecutive sentences. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 9:55 pm
Tri-Serendipity, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
The transcript in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 11:12 am
In Crest v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Sys. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:26 pm
Board of Education helps prove the charge. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:12 am
Statement from the Scottish Legal Aid Board (pdf) Re: Bank charges - Sharp v Bank of Scotland A spokesperson for the Board stated, “We’re surprised and disappointed that Govan Law Centre (GLC) has publicised this case in its press release, in view of the fact that the Board only received their latest letter yesterday, which raised fresh issues and asked us to consider additional information not previously given to us. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:50 am
This ruling appears at odds with a ruling by the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:34 am
The court made specific note that certiorari was granted in light of last week’s decision in Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]