Search for: "Booker v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 5:35 pm
Prakash, Tempest in an Empty Teapot: Why the Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering Colleen V. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
Two top-notch court watchers have two very different perspectives on what yesterday's oral argument in Oregon v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:15 am
Louisiana Issue: Whether the Sixth Amendment, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows criminal convictions based on non-unanimous jury verdicts.And this one shows how times have changed:Case name: Lowery, et al. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 12:18 am
Here is the abstract: Despite the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:10 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 3:02 pm
See blog here, discussing United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:30 pm
Booker (2005).... [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:53 pm
US v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
In Matter of Booker v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:04 pm
Lots also might be said about how a Justice Clinton would approach the future of Roe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:38 am
Although the defendants in United States v. [read post]
