Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 601 - 620
of 9,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
” The Act would prohibit brand name drug companies from compensating generic drug companies to delay the entry of a generic drug into the market. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:57 am
Constellation Brands Inc. 2016 FCA 302, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal has distinguished its own recent decision in Les Restaurants La Pizzaiolle Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:57 am
Constellation Brands Inc. 2016 FCA 302, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal has distinguished its own recent decision in Les Restaurants La Pizzaiolle Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm
The Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:13 pm
” Mead Johnson was held to have engaged in false advertising in this case, and it did not dispute that it had distributed false statements about PBM's formulas on prior occasions, the court observed.The decision is PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
Sara Lee Branded Apparel, 2007 WL 634083 (M.D. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
Sara Lee Branded Apparel, 2007 WL 634083 (M.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:59 pm
Generic drug makers typically set their litigation sights on brand-name drug companies. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
First, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am
Small business people become franchisees of these brands to happily enjoy the goodwill of the brands. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
In Mars Canada Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:56 am
Unilateral changes in health insuranceCivil Service Employees Association v PERB, 274 AD2d 930Since 1990, Dutchess County employees represented by CSEA were offered a prescription drug plan for negotiating unit members enrolled in the Mohawk Valley Physicians’ Health Plan [MVP] that provided for employee co-payments of $3 for generic prescriptions and $5 for brand name drugs. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
In Mars Canada Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
Nor do I think that the relevant brand needs to get any more publicity.But in four different places in this opinion, Justice Benke refers to one of the victims as exclusively smoking "Marlborough cigarettes". [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
In my last unreasonably long post, I discussed the case of Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:50 pm
In Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:09 am
<> Tobias Chavez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:22 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
