Search for: "Bright v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 3,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
On August 31, the University filed a 50-page request for review of the Regional Director's latest decision (full text), arguing not just that the Pacific Lutheran test was misapplied, but arguing also:The new test under PLU  contravenes the United States Supreme Court’s holding in  National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:54 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
In the conclusion, we address an intractable dilemma: in developing GPLs as a means of enhancing the effectiveness of international legal systems, judges reveal gaps between state consent and control, potentially undermining their own support. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Legal Services Commission v Rasool [2008] EWCA Civ 154 (05 March 2008) Revenue & Customs v Dunwood Travel Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 174 (07 March 2008) AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 175 (07 March 2008) Research In Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWCA Civ 153 (06 March 2008) City Inn (Jersey) Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 156 (06 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Private legal transplant appears, therefore, characterized by a bright and a dark side. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
These cases had created a bright-line physical presence test for substantial nexus before a state could impose a duty on an out-of-state vendor to collect sales or use tax. [read post]