Search for: "Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia" Results 601 - 620 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Zach Benoit (2L), Malini Dhanraj (2L), Sam Nath (3L) The competition involved a case of Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Record Number of Trans and Nonbinary People Are Running for Office MSN – Anne Branigan (Washington Post) | Published: 7/27/2022 In 2017, former journalist Danica Roem made history when she was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates, making her the first out transgender state legislator in the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
It’s most likely that the Supreme Court will use rationality review, or some form of it, when reviewing the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:27 am
They did so because - as Justice Kennedy observed, using the evocative language of equal protection -- the Supreme Court's decision in Bowers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Elaine Hou
Baumann Administrative Agencies and the Supreme Court’s Appellate Jurisdiction, by Aditya Bamzai Prosecutorial Discretion in the Biden Administration: Part 5, by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia Thoughts on West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court has vacated a 2011 ruling by West Virginia's highest court that said pre-dispute arbitration agreements between nursing homes and residents cannot be used to resolve wrongful-death and personal injury lawsuits. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
In that same year, 1972, the United States explained to the Supreme Court that "sex, like race and national origin, is a visible and immutable biological characteristic," U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:12 pm
On March 4, 2008, IPBiz received a comment to an earlier post What Gettysburg teaches us about KSR v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
Not only are these school relatively more segregated than those in the Deep South, the level of racial isolation in them actually mirrors the degree of segregation in the South a decade after the celebrated, but disobeyed, Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
 See, e.g., Jack Michael Beermann, Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron and the Anti-Innovation Supreme Court at 8 (March 9, 2023) (“This article also illustrates how the Court is doing a poor job providing clear instructions to lower courts and other government entities on how and in some cases even whether to apply its doctrines. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
A transcript of the interview appears on the High School SCOTUS website (described in its header as “Teenagers Writing About the Supreme Court”). [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court Remains Skeptical of the “Cost-Benefit State” Amy Sinden (Temple University Law School) | Monday, September 26 Recent Court decisions have not created a presumption in favor of formal cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
This latter case, the Supreme Court's first major constitutional decision, is almost certainly included in Federal Courts texts. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
” Among the witnesses who offered their take on both the NLRB’s new joint employer standard and the Protecting Local Business Opportunity Act were a former Board Member and a former NLRB senior attorney who served in the agency’s Appellate and Supreme Court Branch. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
If impeached, the president would be tried by the Supreme Court, not the Senate. [read post]