Search for: "C Akin" Results 601 - 620 of 1,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
Then Defendants argue that their name, “Moschino,” falls into the exception of Section 1202(c), as “personally identifying information about the user of a work”. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Mittal: Akin to Lochnerism, but not really my concern here. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
”Moreover, a language is akin to a computer language, and they claim that “Phrases in a constructed language, like Klingon, are the functional equivalent of computer language instructions. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
The Calgary Herald argued that sections 4(3)(c) and 4(3)(k) of PIPA meant that PIPA would not apply to these activities. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Dave Blair
 C-17s and C-130s transport aircraft have different capabilities, but they share the concept of airlift, and hence, we classify them as cargo aircraft. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:45 am
This is the question that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed yesterday in Austro-Mechana v Amazon, C-572/14 [thanks to EU law enthusiast and scholar Steve Peers for the heads up].The Austrian Supreme Court had in fact asked the CJEU to say whether a claim for missed payment of ‘fair compensation’ under Article 5(2)(b) of the InfoSoc Directive can be considered akin to 'tort, delict or… [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark There have been several very high profile news reports of significant law firm data breaches. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
(c) the provisions of second proviso to section 24 shall apply to all pending  arbitrations.(2) For the purposes of the instant section,—(a) "fresh arbitrations" mean arbitrations where there has been no request for appointment of arbitral tribunal; or application for appointment of arbitral tribunal; or appointment of the arbitral tribunal, prior to the date of enforcement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amending) Act, 2014. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 12:11 pm by Giles Peaker
It would, perhaps, be possible to imagine cases where an arrangement called a licence was either held to be a tenancy, or found to be so much akin to a tenancy that the licensor could not properly be regarded as an occupier in the relevant sense. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
  The Supreme Court’s opinion then returns to the legal ethics issue, noting thatBrockler admitted that the Facebook ruse violated the plain language of [Ohio Professional Conduct Rule] 8.4(c)(prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), but he urged the board to carve out an exception for `prosecutorial investigation deception. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
As Cécile Fabre points out, it is “virtually impossible” to determine whether an individual’s social right has been violated: judges are not competent (term of art) to compare different permutations and combinations of resource allocations. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:15 am
Henrik Saugmandsgaard ØeVia Katfriend and former GuestKat Kate Manning (Curated Media) comes the news that the Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe [here if you read Danish] in Austro-Mechana, C-572/14 - escaping this Kat's attention (and much to her shame) - was in fact released on 17 February 2016.This is yet another reference for a preliminary ruling regarding interpretation of the private copying exception within Article 5(2)(b) of… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:27 am by Amy Starnes
Hankinson; Payne Mitchell Law Group Diamond sponsors — $15,000 — Jerry C. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
He further held that injunctions are available as a remedy for breaches of contract where the contract prohibits acts akin to infringement of an intellectual property right. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed the State Department of Social Services has expressly so recognized in 18 NYCRR § 352.2(c) quoted above, which authorizes the making of a duplicate grant 'because the cash has been lost or stolen' but states that such duplicate allowance is not reimbursable by the State. [read post]