Search for: "C. King v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Further reduced penalty caps are applicable to submissions for certain 501(c)(3) organizations and for Top Hat and Apprenticeship programs. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions under Section 502(b)… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:51 pm
Specifically, they maintain that the certificate of conformity failed to state the qualification of C. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
Consequently, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in King v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
Consequently, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in King v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
The plaintiff cites but one Connecticut decision--and research has failed to reveal any others--DeGolyer v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
v=RaBmWqQkKYE while Lancelot is a creature of Queen Morgana https://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Either Way, Affidavits Are Admissible at Fitzpatrick On Employment Law while headed to the Empire State Building.So c'mon folks. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
His discussion of the impact of King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:41 pm
Saikin of BakerHostetler on the firm’s blog, Health Law Update Corporate Espionage: Not Your Typical Sports-“Gate” – Boston attorney Erik Weibust of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Millions Can Keep Health Coverage Because of the Supreme Court’s Decision in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm
United States Supreme Court – KING ET AL. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
— a guest post by C. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Michael C. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm
Yesterday in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
See McIntyre v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
King Richards, Esq., and Bridget J. [read post]
