Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 601 - 620 of 2,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Florian Mueller
But "Conti" (as the company is commonly referred to in the automotive industry) isn't just waiting for the appellate proceedings to unfold (a decision will likely take about a year from now). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:13 am by Nassiri Law
Some industries, such as stage work and event staffing, are extremely prone to employment misclassification, because these industries typically rely upon subcontractors to hire and provide workers on a temporary basis. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were filed recently in:King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
The Supreme Court sided with the OCC and the banks, holding that the National Bank Act preempted state authority. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Varsity Brands, Inc., involved a legal match-up between two cheerleader uniform companies and resulted in the Court granting broad copyright protection for industrial designs. [read post]