Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. TEXAS"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
It depends on subjective factors applicable to each case, but here are some possible options: (1) Choose a district that one or both parties ask for. (2) Select a proper district that has a number of patent pilot judges, the three largest being Northern Illinois, Southern New York, and Central California. (3) Use history as a guide: In 1997, one year before the large influx to Eastern Texas began, the busiest patent districts were Northern California (172 filings),… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
The California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Sullivan (University of California Press, 2023) (Current). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:22 am
Stern, and her team of lawyers moved an estate case from a Texas probate court to a California bankruptcy court in search of a more favorable venue. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
The California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) is a “think of the kids” law that nominally purports to protect kids’ privacy. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:30 am
In Elite Auto Body LLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Texas Supreme Court JusticesFew Brewster received his law degree from the University of Texas School of Law in 1916. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:39 pm
Since the consumer case was consolidated with FTC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:36 am
Texas joins California, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia in enacting a comprehensive consumer privacy law. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
In Ambato v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm
City of San Antonio (Free Exercise Clause; Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act (TRFRA); Texas Constitution) United States, et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:08 pm
” Complaint in Innovative Automation LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am
That plan, adopted by the Texas legislature in the wake of the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Hopwood v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:03 am
Supreme Court is being asked once again in California v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970); Texas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:50 am
Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:09 pm
I am familiar with California which has a six month waiting period. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
According to the appellate court, if Texas is OK, so is California. [read post]
