Search for: "CHASE v. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 2,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“With regard to the first cause of action, Izmirligil failed to state a cause of action under Real Property Law § 329 against the BNYM defendants and Chase (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:32 am
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, stated that because the car chase Harris initiated posed a substantial and immediate risk of serious physical injury to others, Scott? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]