Search for: "CLAYTON v. STATE"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
In 2010 in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
The Court had adopted the “unfettered” language 83 years earlier (in Clayton v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Condliff’s barrister, Richard Clayton QC, presented two arguments. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:16 pm
Truett Payne Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
On June 23, amidst all furor over its gun rights and abortion decisions, the Supreme Court handed down a little noticed death penalty decision, Nance v Ward. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Clayton Cnty. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Clayton County to further regulatory reforms, such as the Equality Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
Clayton County case where Justice Gorsuch wrote for the majority. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:43 am
Clayton Cty., Ga. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
FTC v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:45 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court decided a fun case with a funny title: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
In the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Following on the heels of the Supreme Court’s June 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:38 am
(United States, et al., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Clayton County (2020) (holding that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination violate Title VII), invoked the logic of Holcomb, as did the Seventh Circuit’s earlier opinion in Hively v. [read post]
