Search for: "COST v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
(See a list and short description of some of the main programs authorized by the Social Security Act, taking up 6 pages in Adinolfi v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:18 pm
Additional Resources: It’s time for action on Social Security disability insurance, May 6, 2016, The Hill, By Jim McCrery and Earl Pomeroy More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am
Except in a case of proven bad faith, the plaintiff is exempt from court costs and from the burden of paying the prevailing party’s attorney fees and costs. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
That’s where the imbalance comes: relatively manageable cost of doing business v. creation side is being killed by piracy and dealing w/great burdens from §512 to little effect. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
Geist failed to notice that the border measures he refers to that pertain to “confusingly similar” trademark goods permits detention to be made by “competent authorities”, which the TPP makes clear includes “the appropriate judicial, administrative or law enforcement authorities under a Party’s law. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
” (p.16, quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
Under one approach, the administrative agency (state or federal, and sometimes both) is a necessary first stop for a discrimination plaintiff. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Justice Kennedy also found unpersuasive Vermont’s counterargument that respondent has not shown that the State scheme has caused it to suffer economic costs, stating that Liberty Mutual need not wait to bring its pre-emption claim until confronted with numerous inconsistent obligations and encumbered with any ensuing costs. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
On 17 February 2016, Dingemans J dealt with costs issues in the case of Lokhova v Longmuir. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
However, before any income is required to be applied to the person's cost of care, [certain] deductions will be made" On the instant appeal, petitioner contends that the transfer of Hammond's recurring Social Security retirement and pension income into the third-party SNT created for the benefit must be excluded from her NAMI for the purpose of calculating her own contribution towards her Medicaid post-eligibility benefits. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
The Times highlights the human cost of France’s emergency measures by taking a look at examples of “government overreach as over the last year France has become a laboratory for balancing security concerns against civil liberties. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am
But the statute also provides that an alien who is “lawfully present” in the country is eligible to receive Social Security benefits as well as benefits under the supplemental security income program. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
