Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
The California Court of Appeal, in Horsford v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
The judgment concerns an appeal from a decision of Arnold J on a preliminary issue [2016] EWHC 2220 (Pat), regarding the construction of a California law governed patent cross-licensing agreement containing a covenant not to assert patents against third parties. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am
California (1962). [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am
The most common Advertising Rule deficiencies observed include: (i) misleading performance results, caused by lack of sufficient disclosures, (ii) misleading one-on-one presentations, (iii) misleading claims of compliance with voluntary performance standards, (iv) cherry-picked profitable stock selections, (v) misleading selection of recommendations, and (vi) failure to implement compliance policies and procedures designed to prevent non-compliant advertising practices. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:43 am
The cross-licence is governed by the laws of the state of California. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
The Court of Appeal’s opinion makes a useful contribution to published CEQA case law. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
The Court of Appeal’s opinion makes a useful contribution to published CEQA case law. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
He is currently researching cross-border media law issues. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
McNeely The Court of Appeals addressed McNeely in State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
Note: Following the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Jones v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
OfficeMax California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:14 pm
(City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:14 pm
(City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
I'm usually not a fan of the California Supreme Court reaching out to depublish an opinion by the Court of Appeal.But here's a good candidate for precisely that.There's a loose horse out in a rural area, so police officers (understandably) investigate. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
However, of even greater significance, and as of the same date, there are 30 Trump administration nominations to federal court judgeships awaiting Senate action, including eight for the Courts of Appeals and 22 for the District Courts. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
The court also discussed the Backpage v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
The California Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal, and remanded to the Superior Court for entry of judgment in favor of Defendants. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
The California Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal, and remanded to the Superior Court for entry of judgment in favor of Defendants. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24; see, e.g., People v. [read post]
