Search for: "Cable v. Cable"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
Northeast Cable Televis., LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
Civil litigation — High/low agreement — Breach Verizon Maryland, LLC (hereinafter “Appellee”) brought a lawsuit against Sagres Construction Corporation (hereinafter “Appellant”), in the Circuit Court for Prince Georges’ County, alleging that Appellant negligently damaged Appellee’s underground duct bank and copper communications cables. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:31 am
The ITC case is In re Certain Cardio-Strength Training Magnetic-Resistance Cable Exercise Machines and Components Thereof, Docket No. 337-TA-3380 (pending institution), with a companion case ICON Health & Fitness v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm
Court of Appeals in McKeever v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 10:18 am
Monster Energy Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:02 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:50 am
Attachments: van Schewick 2019 H.R.1096 v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Drone Strikes in Somalia (Somali plaintiff v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:52 pm
The next step in Duncan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:52 pm
The next step in Duncan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
See Sunbeam Prods. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:13 am
Where a season of a successful series on a broadcast network will comprise 22 episodes plus generous residuals, cable and streaming series orders will be 8, 10 or 13 episodes, with much smaller residuals, if any. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm
In PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:29 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
Judge McFadden distinguishes it, saying that case involved a close intertwining between the government and the cable channel. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
These ratings are applied to most TV and cable programming except news, sports, and ads. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:07 pm
Sometimes it can seem so tempting to draft the broadest possible non-competition provision, but a recent case out of the Western District of Arkansas, Foster Cable Services v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Iancu v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
Additionally, the court appeared to agree that having alternative sources of “must see” video content, such as DirecTV and Uverse, did not create significantly greater incentives for AT&T to drive a hard bargain with video programming distributors, such as cable operators, knowing that during an extended black out period, disgruntled subscribers could migrate to AT&T-owned options. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
Additionally, the court appeared to agree that having alternative sources of “must see” video content, such as DirecTV and Uverse, did not create significantly greater incentives for AT&T to drive a hard bargain with video programming distributors, such as cable operators, knowing that during an extended black out period, disgruntled subscribers could migrate to AT&T-owned options. [read post]
