Search for: "California Co. v. Price"
Results 601 - 620
of 895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that an energy company had been charged with conspiring to jack up electricity prices during California's 2001 power crisis, the case ended Tuesday with deferred prosecution agreements. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) Global Global - General Barack Obama and US IP Policy, IP litigation and share price, IP Strategy and open innovation – IP Think Tank podcast 19 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Three ways to maintain your IP intelligence edge in lean times (Thomson Reuters Scientific) International standards organisation solicits views on improving the intangible valuation process (IAM) What is an IP strategist? [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
(Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in Pleau.) [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
JGJg’s only assets were about $28,000 cash and the California ADA valued at $180,000. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Walthers, Inc (Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court C D California: Falsely advertising compliance with patented method constitutes false marking: King Tuna v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Two grant approvals were recently announced: $2.86 million to a Tennessee electric Co-Op and $9.75 million to Orangeburg County, SC. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
Until recently, the California Resale Royalties Act gave artists a royalty right to 5% of the sale price of an artwork sold for more than $1,000 in California or by a California resident, if the artwork had increased in value. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
California’s sterilization law was enacted in 1909. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al v John T Minemyer… [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm
Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Kenneth Vanko answers both questions in his recent post on the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Milliken & Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
