Search for: "California v. Superior Court"
Results 601 - 620
of 5,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012); and only weeks ago the United States Supreme Court decided Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:10 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:49 pm
Superior Court and Brinkley v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
We remand the two named plaintiffs‘ meal and rest break period violation claims for reconsideration in light of the California Supreme Court‘s ruling in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Mayhew of Stanislaw Superior Court issued his Notice of Hearing on Issues Re Remand (pdf)in the case of Debra Coito v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:30 am
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal. 5th 903.) [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:09 am
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
Superior Court (2005) 37 Cal.4th 108. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:02 pm
Superior Court, on November 8, 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Superior Court of California brought the justices a case at the intersection of class actions and personal jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:01 pm
Superior Court, S166350, and O’Neil v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:02 pm
Some courts have held that they are, including the California Court of Appeal, and some courts have held that they aren't (including different panels of the California Court of Appeal).Justice Dawson persuades me that it's not work product. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:52 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:07 am
The California Court of Appeal has held that Korea Supply Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:12 pm
So the attorneys seek some documents from the San Diego District Attorney's Office under the California Public Records Act; namely, the court filings in death penalty cases between 1977 and 1993.To be clear: The only documents the defendant seeks are publicly filed documents in death penalty cases.The DA's Office refuses to produce them. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:59 pm
" (Amendariz [v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:12 am
The court cited the McCann v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Last June, the California Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Iskanian v. [read post]
