Search for: "Canon v. Justice Court" Results 601 - 620 of 1,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Connecticut Supreme Court Enforces Dennis Canon [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:24 am by Danielle D'Onfro
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in City of Chicago v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
The Justices awarded relist gold to the petitioner in Hinton v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
The IPKat has now had some time to put its razor-sharp fangs into the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am by Marty Lederman
 As Mike and I wrote, if the Court were to accept this invitation, it "would turn the constitutional avoidance canon on its head. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am by John Elwood
On Monday, the justices denied review to nine-time relist Thomas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that ruling, but last week, in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am by Guest Blogger
In a sweeping and ennobling opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Our brief shows how the canonical equal protection cases United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
 That Justice O'Connor announced a federalism canon in 1991 (or the Court applied similar ones in other cases from that time period) hardly provides support for the originalist bona fides of the canon. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
Instead, in addition to Justice Thomas’s vote, she also received the support of Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connorâ€"in a “marijuana case” no less. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:00 am by Nedim Malovic
In September 2018, the General Court considered that the Applicant’s mark had weak distinctive character and there was no likelihood of confusion between the two marks.The Applicant filed yet another appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]