Search for: "Carr v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 4:52 am by Rob Robinson
A Not so Authoritative Look at What "Cloud" Terms Mean - http://tinyurl.com/3hn834g (Jerome Wendt) Cloud Computing Market Predicted To Hit $240 Billion By 2020 - http://tinyurl.com/3vaob7k (Michael Ide) Cloud Computing Poised to Escalate - http://bit.ly/kqEeX4 (Dilip Tinnelvelly) Email Marketing and the Email Administrator - http://tinyurl.com/3nf23dv (Jeff Orloff) Exchange Server and Unified Messaging - http://tinyurl.com/3khrc5m (Mike Rede) Google Gmail Gets Shared Inboxes -… [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  (The Court acknowledged a split of authority on that question in footnote 2 of its opinion last Term in Carr v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Carr (C.A. 3, 1994), 25 F.3d 1194; United States v. $639,558.00 in United States Currency (C.A. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
   The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
   The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Echostar - Richmond lawyer Dabney Carr of Troutman Sanders on the firm's blog, Virginia IP Law Social Media Signals of an Employee Departure - Dallas non-compete attorney Rob Radcliff on his Smooth Transitions Law Blog Ask The Typography Guru: Part Deux - Houston lawyer Kendall Gray of Andrews Kurth on his blog, The Appellate Record When Can a Divorced Parent Move Out-of-State with a Child? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:09 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Carr. which held that state redistricting could be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause, and continually spawns lawsuit after lawsuit? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Mr Carr did not dispute that position or that the point was important and could be decisive. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Carr, the Court vacated the defendant’s sentence and remanded the case for resentencing, stating that “the trial court committed plain legal error in scoring Offense Variable (OV) 1 because the defendant did not use the methadone against her child as a weapon, as is required to score the variable. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]