Search for: "Case v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 601 - 620
of 751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2018, 11:32 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue – see https://www.bolderadvocacy.org/blog/parks-case-pauses-unresolved-questions (incl the amicus brief from @AFJustice & @COF_) What is electioneering? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
Department of the Treasury; Steven Miller, in his capacity as the Acting Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service; and their respective agencies (DHHS, Treasury and IRS). [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
Love letter from the IRS The “why” is found in Internal Revenue Service INFO 2002-0024 (released 3/29/2002). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
After a decline in revenues from the team's trade mark licences in 2000, an agreement was negotiated between the teams and Reebok International. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue, 69 TCM 2852 [1995]). [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
Warby J gave judgment on some case management issues in the case of Economou v De Freitas ([2016] EWHC 1218 (QB)). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(d) The term "competent authorities" means, in the case of the United States, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue as authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury; and, in the case of Japan, the Minister of Finance or his authorized representative.(2) In the application of the provisions of the present convention by either contracting State any term not otherwise defined shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the meaning which such… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:31 am
In the March 24, 2022 Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) regarding Church Tax Inquiries and Examinations Under IRC 7611, it provides: In cases subject to the declaratory judgment procedures under IRC 7428, IRC 7611(g) provides that any final report of an examiner is treated as a final adverse determination under IRC 7428(a)(1) and any church receiving such a report shall be treated for purposes of IRC 7428 and IRC 7430 as having exhausted the administrative remedies… [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Ranch royalty rate survey (IP finance) FreePatentsOnline: a remarkable symmetry - 'Flash of Genius' sponsorship of Patent Plaque Program (IP finance) Managing external patent specialists (Innovationpartners) The first step to generating revenue from 'patent monetisation' is understanding what the term means (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Think business cannot predict the future? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Nette.[67] The case involved the rephrasing of the standard of causation for culpable homicide set out in R. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:21 am
Our last three new relists are cases the Supreme Court had held for the disposition in Wooden: Lewis v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 1:32 pm
Statement of IRS Commissioner Describing New Streamlined Procedures. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 8:20 pm
The court ruled in Commissioner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:30 pm
In the case, Loving v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (IPKat) A touch of class: Latest news of IP TRANSLATOR (IPKat) Beware the ‘own name’ defense – AG opinion in Edwin Co (Property, intangible) General Court: likelihood of confusion for Oyster and Oystra (Class 46) OHIM Board of Appeal: nasty decision about the comparison of goods – no likelihood of confusion between MALONE and MALOTE (Class 46) Can a European… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
There are cases where the Company Court has laid so much emphasis on the interests of the parties who are not actually before it. [read post]
