Search for: "Change v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 50,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Charles P. Romano, Ph.D.
Nonetheless, proposals which would fundamentally change the operation of Bayh-Dole are now before us. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am by INFORRM
The Judge re-stated the need to make allowance for editorial judgment, citing the principles summarised in Banks-v-Cadwalladr [2022] 1 WLR 5236. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Malcolm Birdling
The second prompt is the General Court’s recent decision in Case T-426/21 Nizar Assaad v Council ECLI:EU:T:2023:114. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:52 pm by Eric Lockridge
  There are no creditors’ committee counsel fees or United States Trustee fees to pay, which can be huge savings when compared to a regular bankruptcy case. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
  Again, that production is iterative (eg it changes with each production of regulatory objects) and each iteration tests and changes the exact framing of the normative premises within which iterative"dialog" (eg through processes of consultation both among regulatory producers and the major forces of consumers of regulation--in the case of AI enterprises, civil society, and techno-bureaucracies (public, private, academic)). [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
“In 1787, the men who wrote the Constitution,” Lapore argues, “added a provision for amendment—Article V—knowing that changing circumstances would demand revision. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 7:44 pm by Kurt R. Karst
 However, the dissent does not buy this, stating that “the incredible assertion [that the ruling is limited to civil penalty suits for fraud] should fool no one,” and concludes that the Court’s decision “is a massive sea change. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:07 am by Holly
  In May, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) redefined the test for nonobviousness [LKQ Corp. v. [read post]