Search for: "Childs v. Gross" Results 601 - 620 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
The facts in the second case, Vaughan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Dunlap was the mens rea requirement for gross sexual imposition involving a victim under 13. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the plaintiffs claim of damages remains speculative and unascertainable (see Parola, Gross & Marino, P.C. v Susskind, 43 AD3d 1020, 843 NYS2d 104 [2d Dept 20071; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292,727 NYS2d 58 [Ist Dept 20011, Oot v Arno, 275 AD2d 1023,713 NYS2d 382 [4th Dept 20001). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm by LawDiva
For the purposes of an alimony order, the court shall exclude from its income calculation gross income the court has already considered for setting a child support order. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
`(B) MEASUREMENT- For purposes of subparagraph (A)(iii), there is no measurable adverse effect on public health or safety if the exception described in subparagraph (A) will result in no measurable increase in blood lead levels of a child. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am by INFORRM
As Gross LJ observed, those who choose to conduct their quarrels in such a fashion take the risk that they may not be able to insist thereafter on clear boundary lines between what is public and what is private – regardless of whether they were, hitherto, only public personalities in a very limited sense. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
As Gross LJ observed,  those who choose to conduct their quarrels in such a fashion take the risk that they may not be able to insist thereafter on clear boundary lines between what is public and what is private – regardless of whether they were, hitherto, only public personalities in a very limited sense. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
In Cart, the appellant had unsuccessfully appealed to the Social Security and Child Support Tribunal (whose jurisdiction has since been taken over by the First-tier Tribunal) against a decision of the Child Support Agency. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
And it might also intervene “where there has been a wholly exceptional collapse of fair procedure: something as gross as actual bias on the part of the tribunal”. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court concluded that the mother established by the requisite preponderance of the evidence that the proposed relocation would serve the child's best interests" (Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]