Search for: "Coats v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 6:33 am by Susan Brenner
Coates, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm by admin
The Willms settlement order imposes a judgment of $359 million that will be suspended upon Willms’s surrender of bank account funds and proceeds from the sale of his house, personal property, and corporate assets, including a Cadillac Escalade, fur coat, and artwork. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm by admin
The Willms settlement order imposes a judgment of $359 million that will be suspended upon Willms’s surrender of bank account funds and proceeds from the sale of his house, personal property, and corporate assets, including a Cadillac Escalade, fur coat, and artwork. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:41 am by Jamison Koehler
In what is probably the most widely cited case on this defense in the District, Acker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
They filed a main request and auxiliary requests I to V together with the statement of the grounds of appeal.Claim 1 of the main request read:1. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
Also, the Max Planck Study on the Overall Functioning of the European Trade Mark System of February 2011, stated that current European Court of Justice jurisprudence on the issue was "neither consistent nor satisfactory" (see paragraph 2.178 here). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
A report linked to from Destin states that TDS were furious at this sentance which they felt was unduly lenient. [read post]