Search for: "Commonwealth v. Grant, R."
Results 601 - 620
of 685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm
Oputa’s view was recently echoed by Nweze JSC in Conoil v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:20 am
The leading recent case in Kentucky is Jones v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
It has also asked for an adjournment in an Operation Elveden trial involving a journalist while it considers the “wider implications” of the decision in R v ABC and others [2015] EWCA Crim 359. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
” (emphasis added)); Sean R. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
" Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
In the courts Omar & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2012] EWHC 1737 (Admin) The Divisional Court held that Norwich Pharmacal principles (enables orders to be granted to obtain info from third parties to see whether there was unlawful conduct) cannot be used to obtain evidence from Foreign Secretary for use in a foreign court. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) for a discussion on The Global Hostage Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLPOn August 18, 2010 the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No 33-9135, a cease and desist order (the Order) settling claims against the state of New Jersey as a result of what the SEC determined was inadequate disclosure of the financial condition of New Jersey's pension funds.Health care reform — regulations issued on expanded internal/external claims review process for nongrandfathered group health plansHunton & Williams LLPOn July… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
The case of Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, the Secretary for State for the Home Department and the UK security and intelligence agencies (SIAs) (Case C-623/17) concerns the conditions under which SIAs may process communications metadata (i.e. traffic and location data, not message content) collected by telecommunications providers. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
If you remove the decision-making power from ministers and civil servants and grant it to an independent agen [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
Finally, when arguments such as this come up, I like to go back to the opinion by Judge Leon Higginbotham, one of the earliest Black district judges, then on the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (and later the Third Circuit) in Commonwealth of Pa. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
In an article, Brad R. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
Moreover, the grounds for granting anti-suit injunctions are ill defined and confusing – in this regard, the law has travelled backwards rather than forwards in the past century (another Goffian project). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
This work augments our notice-and-action model and builds upon our strong cooperation with law enforcement, trusted flaggers and our community of users.[6] Canada and other Commonwealth country courts take an approach that is similar to the approach under the EU Ecommerce Directive. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
In hearing the question of leave together with the appeal, then granting leave, the two key issues for determination by the Court of Appeal were: Whether a claim for unliquidated damages could fall within the scope of the arbitration clause which required claims to be concerning monetary amounts ‘under this agreement’ (the construction issue); and Whether Hannigan had waived his entitlement to arbitrate by bringing the proceedings in 2017 (the waiver issue). [read post]
