Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 601 - 620 of 14,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court’s Decision in United States v Aguilar By a vote of 8-1, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals with respect to Aguilar’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am by David Cosgrove
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  that under 42 USC § 1983 and state law.The Court of Claims granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim No. 126268 as against the State and the Attorney General's Office, and Claim No. 126067 as against the State and the Attorney General's Office. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:53 am
A game and fish officer’s stop of a car leaving a pier was valid as an administrative search. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the California Court of Appeal – 2d District: Dove v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:15 am by Daniel R. Levy, Carolyn O. Boucek
Judge Brown set the tone for her decision by quoting the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Loper Bright Enters. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Former employees alleged they were the target of selective prosecution in administrative disciplinary actionBey v New York City Civil Service Commission, Supreme Court, Justice Madden, 2001 NY Slip Op 30058(U), [not officially reported]New York City conducted an investigation to determine which employees were claiming tax-exempt status or were claiming an excessive number of exemptions. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
“[T]he enforceability of [an] administrative subpoena,” on the other hand, “is governed, not by [the Court’s] decision in Barlow’s ... but rather by [its] decision in Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:01 pm
His analysis seems airtight under the most directly applicable Supreme Court precedent, Freytag v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
Off-duty police officer not acting in the performance of his or her duties at the time of his or her injury not eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits Martin v Clarkstown, 2012 NY Slip Op 51482(U), Supreme Court, Rockland County [Not selected for publications in the Official Reports] Daniel Martin, a Clarkstown police officer, was injured in the line of duty and was approved for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law Section… [read post]