Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 601 - 620
of 21,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
WILLIAMS, Petitioner, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:32 pm
DA 08-0559, MATT O’DEA, Petitioner/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:20 am
The recent decision in Natwest Markets plc v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
Bartenfelder v Bartenfelder, Nos. 0934, 2052 [Ct. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:16 am
SORNA Constitutionality Thee Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act's requirement that convicted sex offenders update their registration when they cross a state line is constitutional. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 1:42 pm
Superior Court judges do not typically allow re-cross examinations. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:06 pm
Childers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:49 am
Tenth Circuit concludes, in fraud case involving the sale of aircraft parts, cross-examination of character witnesses did not include impermissible guilt-assuming hypothetical questions based on the charges, but any error was harmless based on overwhelming evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Peace Cross (American Legion et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Here are the materials in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday’s disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us – People v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
Note: David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses the President and General Counsel of the Institute for Justice, Scott Bullock, one of the nation’s foremost opponents of eminent-domain abuse. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 2:46 am
Fair, Reasonable and Non-DiscriminatoryPhotographer Tumi-1983 Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Mann) Koninklijke Philips NV v Tinno Mobile Technology Corporation and others [2020] EWHC 2553 (Ch) (25 Sept 2020)This was an application and cross-application in a patent infringement case. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Regina v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1153; [2010] WLR (D) 142 “In criminal proceedings, the circumstances in which one party would be permitted pursuant to s 100(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to ask a witness a question in cross-examination with a view to eliciting an answer implicating that witness in bad behaviour, which behaviour that party would be otherwise unable to prove, were infrequent and limited in scope. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:28 am
CSV Hospitality Management LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 6:55 pm
Leonardi v Cruz, 2010 NY Slip Op 04257 (1sr Dept. 2010) “Furthermore, although “[a] cross motion for summary judgment made after the expiration of the statutory 120-day period may be considered by the court, even in the absence of good cause, where a timely motion for summary judgment was made seeking relief nearly identical to that [...] [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:52 am
According to Ohio v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 6:28 am
It was suggested in Interscope v. [read post]
