Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Park v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
A similar law was passed in Arizona in 2010 before being struck down in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
This law makes it a state offense to illegally cross the border. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm
BrazilGazeta do Povo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:41 pm
Today's decision by Magistrate Judge Jill Morris in McClanahan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
On Monday, in Tingley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
In her majority opinion, Justice O’Connor wrote that “while a State, consistent with the First Amendment, may ban cross burning carried out with the intent to intimidate, the provision in the Virginia statute treating any cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate renders the statute unconstitutional in its current form. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
In Kenya, the High Court dismissed an application for injunction in Netresource Limited v Ministry of Education & 3 others stating that no prima facie case was established. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:00 am
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
The practice of tolerating discreet crosses on a necklace, and so on, common in Europe, could not be accepted. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm
Liquidia appealed, and United Therapeutics cross-appealed the parts of the decision that were respectively disadvantageous to each party. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:05 pm
From Thursday's decision by Judge Randolph Moss (D.D.C.) in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:19 am
Interestingly enough, the Court did not grant the cross-petition for certiorari filed by AHM. [read post]
