Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court" Results 601 - 620 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 9:49 am by Shea Denning
Combs appealed the order to superior court pursuant to G.S. 20-16.2(e). [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm by Sinead Ring
The case is important for its discussion of the practical hurdles faced by the Superior Courts in applications for judicial review seeking an order of prohibition. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 7:15 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A 1970, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:27 pm
Following a hearing, the Marion Superior Court issued findings of fact, conclusions of law, and entry of preliminary injunction on March 13, 2008. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
   A recent ruling by California Superior Court Judge Timothy Patrick Dillon, however, has dealt a blow to the Commissioner's efforts. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
If the legitimacy of the administrative state was the subcurrent of Kisor, the Supreme Court’s willingness to overrule its prior decisions was a strong cross-current. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:41 am by Colin Lachance
Cross referenced against the 1.1 million cases in the CanLII database, only 6 have been mentioned 20 or more times in other cases, and even then, predominantly by the Provincial Court itself and only rarely a superior court or a court of different jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 65-page opinion certified for publication and filed October 22, 2015, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal affirmed the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment denying writ petitions by the City of Beverly Hills (“City”) and the Beverly Hills Unified School District (“District”). [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:27 pm by Aaron Weems
Recently, any ambiguity was mostly removed when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the Superior Court’s decision through a split, 3-3 decision (an evenly divided court results in affirmation of the Superior Court decision). [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:38 pm by admin
Malachi, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey recently held that two individuals who had just exited a vehicle and were struck and killed while crossing the street were not entitled to underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage because they were no longer “occupying” their vehicle. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
Except the Supreme Court didn’t decide in State v. [read post]