Search for: "Crow v. Crow"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 1:17 am
People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Lochner v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:43 am
Sep 22, 2009) (NO. 1019)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (David Crow of counsel), and Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York (Whitney M. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:46 pm
Jun 19, 2008) (NO. 3964)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (David Crow of counsel), and Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York (Philip A. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 2:30 am
People v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
It was the entire system of Jim Crow, carefully built, year by year, in state after state that sought to subordinate Black people encompassingly. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:22 pm
There is actually a good deal of Supreme Court precedent on this point (the leading modern case is Village of Arlington Heights v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:38 pm
Turner v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:32 pm
In it we argue that academic (and other) writing on executive power adopts the "neutral principles" approach so (in)famously posited by Herbert Wechsler some sixty years ago, when he used his analysis to explain why Brown v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm
Tibbs, From Black Power to Prison Power: The Making of Jones v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 2:30 pm
The case, Brummer v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
[i] Lynch v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm
Some might remember that the parties in Lochner v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
Since its 1978 decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
If you're a judge or Justice, know, but pretend not to know, that this is how the politics will play out.C) Race-based affirmative action (coming soon in the Harvard and UNC cases):Step 1: Forbid on constitutional and statutory grounds all race-conscious measures that aim to ameliorate centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, and ongoing instances of white supremacy because "the Constitution [and the rest of our law] is color-blind. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 11:06 am
The Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby v. [read post]
