Search for: "D. Tran" Results 601 - 620 of 1,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2015, 5:17 pm
The Trial by Franz Kafka (Breon Mitchell, trans.)21. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
The intellectual property chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is certainly misunderstood. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 9:01 am by Michael Geist
D is for Dot-Sucks, one of hundreds of new top-level domains that launched in 2015. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:58 am by Michael Geist
D is for Dot-Sucks, one of hundreds of new top-level domains that launched in 2015. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:01 pm by Lydia Zuraw
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) offered up a bill to make COOL on meat voluntary. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 11:59 pm by Mark Summerfield
In addition to provisions relating to the scope of available patent rights and general procedures, which I wrote about in the first part of this series, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement prescribes certain minimum standards for terms of protection – including extensions or adjustments to patent term in certain circumstances. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:20 am by Aidan J. Delgado
Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) succinctly put it: the TPP has “exclusions up the wazoo. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:28 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
This morning the Obama administration publicly released the previously-undisclosed text of the Trans Pacific Partnership, or TPP, revealing, among other things, the provisions related to trade secrets that had previously been discussed here. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:28 am by James P. Flynn
This morning the Obama administration publicly released the previously-undisclosed text of the Trans Pacific Partnership, or TPP, revealing, among other things, the provisions related to trade secrets that had previously been discussed here. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 7:12 pm
His research focuses on human rights in their national-constitutional, trans-national and international contexts. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:54 am by INFORRM
They’d never had so much help from a company before. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:19 pm by Elliot Harmon
The horrifying details of the finalized Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement stand as a stark reminder of why laws should be written in the open. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
ForestEthics Advocacy Association and D. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:14 pm by Mark Summerfield
  This line has been followed primarily for the benefit of the US negotiators of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), who initially wanted the agreement to mandate a minimum 12 years’ data exclusivity. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:57 am by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
After eight years of negotiations, the United States and 11 other nations have reached an accord on the historic Trans-Pacific Partnership. [read post]