Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT" Results 601 - 620 of 8,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 4:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  One point of contention might be based on our recent co-written column, "A Debt is a Debt is a Debt," one part of which summarized an argument that we made in a Columbia Law Review article in 2014. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:45 am by Joshua Lloyd
Changes to qualification statutes for all 50 states and the District of Columbia have also been captured in the book’s statutory section. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:17 am by Justin Sherman
Under the proposed order, the company would pay a $100,000 penalty—on top of another $100,000 it has agreed to pay in total to the District of Columbia, Connecticut, and Oregon for violating their laws. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am by Ilya Somin
Most obviously, the jurisdictions that currently authorize home equity theft—some twelve states and the District of Columbia—will no longer be allowed to do so. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 pm by David Klein
Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia now allow online sports betting. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:24 pm by Amy Howe
District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that the policy itself is illegal and ordered the government to end it. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:10 am by Legal Profession Prof
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia agreed with the Federal Election Commission that rules governing in-kind contributions applied to an effort on behalf of a certain Florida Governor. [read post]
16 May 2023, 2:23 pm by Melody Lanier
Based in San Antonio, the company generates billions of dollars annually in revenue by offering a range of insurance products to eligible members across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
This does not mean there cannot be other restrictions on voting, but the government must justify them under section 1: see, for example, Fitzgerald v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:11 am by David Oxenford and Robert Primosch
The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau released a Public Notice announcing that EEO Mid-Term Reviews for radio and television stations will start with review of the Annual EEO Public File Reports filed by radio stations in the District of Columbia, Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:47 pm by John Cozine, Esq.
However, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Wyoming, as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, have not enacted contingency fee bans. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:00 am by Beryl Lipton
Grocery store trips, walks down the street, and otherwise minding your own business when outside your home could soon come under the ever-present eye of the government. [read post]
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled on Tuesday that former Guantánamo Bay detainee Omar Ahmed Khadr waived his right to appeal his war crime convictions under the Military Commissions Act. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am by Michael C. Dorf
That everyone includes holders of bonds issued before the government hit the debt ceiling, so they would not be injured. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Columbia Broadcasting System, a case that established that "[c]rimes and torts committed in news gathering are not protected by the First Amendment" (61 AD2d 491, 494 [1st Dep't 1978]). [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
A jury in the District of Columbia today returned guilty verdicts on multiple felonies against five members of the Proud Boys, finding four of the defendants guilty of seditious conspiracy for their actions before and during the breach of the U.S. [read post]