Search for: "Davis v. Banks"
Results 601 - 620
of 741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976); In re Register, 84 N.C. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Arab Bank, the new petitioners seek to challenge the D.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
McDorman, No. 05-41347 In a suit brought by former directors of a bank alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and state-law claims, a take nothing judgment against defendants is affirmed, primarily as: 1) defendants properly raised the in pari delicto defense; 2) contrary to directors' claim, in pari delicto is a cognizable defense to a civil RICO claim; 3) the district court properly followed the Bateman Eichler formulation of in pari… [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Financial reporting, GAAP, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Amicus Brief of Law and Finance Professors in Verition Partners v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Mast v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
These types of conflicts, of course, are not unprecedented.[23] For example, U.S. courts for many years have had to determine whether to enforce (via contempt citations) U.S. grand jury subpoenas seeking documents, despite claims by the recipients of those subpoenas that compliance would violate foreign laws, such as bank secrecy laws.[24] Some decisions have rejected arguments that it is “unfair to require the [recipient of the subpoena] to be put in the position of… [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:14 am
Davis’s life savings. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:15 am
”); Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001); Addington v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
A contract may be automatically discharged (meaning all current and prospective rights and obligations are cancelled) under the doctrine of frustration upon an occurrence which: makes the contract physically or commercially impossible to perform; or makes the performance of the contract radically different from what was contemplated at the time the contract was entered into (see Davis Contractors v Fareham Urban District Counsel UDC [1956] AC 696. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09541-19 Brown v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07929-19 Dunn v Liverpool Echo,1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuges (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03690-19 Davies v The Jewish Chronicle,1 Accuracy (2018). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
The victim in this Davie County murder case was a “neighborhood runner,” running errands for people in general, and allegedly running drugs for the defendant. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
In 1986, the Supreme Court held in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Lago Vista Independent School District (1998) and Davis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:45 am
First Nat’l State Bank, 87 N.J. 163, 176 (1981); In re Will of Liebl, 260 N.J. [read post]
