Search for: "Davis v. Key"
Results 601 - 620
of 973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2014, 7:54 pm
Below are some key merger and Investment Canada Act highlights from 2013 and early 2014. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
The following are several of the key Canadian misleading advertising law highlights from 2013. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
The following are several of the key Canadian misleading advertising law highlights from 2013. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:04 am
The following are several of the key Canadian misleading advertising law highlights from 2013. ____________________ Competition Bureau v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:58 am
A publication ban is in place.Read the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decisionJan. 17 — Alberta — Davis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Accordingly, Congress afforded large employers two alternatives: they can, as with Social Security, pay a tax to help subsidize the government’s provision of the benefit (Option iv above)—or they can offer their employees access to an insurance plan itself that gives employees the full scope of the universal benefit (Option iii above).The key statutory provision in this regard is 26 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:01 am
John Fund (No. 13-317), the case that may upset the Basic v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
3 and 4 December 2013 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
[Footnote: Davis ex rel. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
Coke's inauguration restored Democratic control in Texas.Imagine if, upon receipt of the Supreme Court order in Bush v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Earlier in 2012, we reported on the case of Brito v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 2:28 pm
In The Globe and Mail v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:54 am
While protective order violations have nothing to do with the merits of (non-)infringement and (in)validity arguments, it's a matter of perception, and Samsung is presumably afraid of future jurors reading about drastic sanctions against Samsung and/or its lawyers.I'm going to provide this update in three parts:Patentgate: Judge Koh apparently underwhelmed by Samsung's emergency motionLimited damages retrial: preparations on the home stretchSecond California case: summary judgment motions… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:16 am
Gawker MediaLawsuit Against Avvo for Lawyer's Profile Dismissed as SLAPP--Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am
I spent the last 4.5 years keying this data in. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Keeping a Pulse on Class and Collective Actions: An Analysis of Recent Supreme Court and Federal Court Decisions Involving FRCP Rule 23 and the FLSA The panel will discuss recent, key decisions involving 1) AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
