Search for: "Day v. Greene" Results 601 - 620 of 2,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am by Kalvis Golde
At The Atlantic, Richard Hasen remembers the decision in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am by Cyberleagle
Consider the days when unregulated theatres were reckoned to be a danger to society and the Lord Chamberlain censored plays. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at Newsweek, Alida Garcia warns that “[ICE] admits it is reopening previously closed removal cases of DACA recipients, [which] could allow [the agency] to start detaining and deporting people as quickly as possible if the Supreme Court gives it the green light” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral argument in Babb v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm by Mark Walsh
As the first substantive day of the impeachment trial wore on, and on, from yesterday into the early morning hours of today, one cable-TV pundit suggested that Chief Justice John Roberts might not feel compelled to attend today’s oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Instead, Plaintiff moved for reconsideration more than 14 days later, and the motion was subsequently denied. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
The usual concepts – justice, productivity, money, honor – are not well-explored in the day-in, day-out of law practice. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook adopted a non-interventionist policy, essentially green-lighting the worst kinds of political advertising. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am by Eric Goldman
Nebraska school officials had to deal with the threat of a student “fire” emoji that seemed to suggest a violent attack would occur at the school the next day. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
Along with HB 40, which he signed two days earlier, the legislation means that sodomy, adultery, and fornication are no longer illegal in the state. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]