Search for: "Deal v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 26,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2014, 11:53 am by Elizabeth LaForgia
Rabbi Binyomin Ginsberg sued Northwest Airlines for breach of implied covenant of good faith in dealing under Minnesota state contract law after the airline removed him from their frequent flyer program. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:41 am by Colleen Mallick
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] in McFadden v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:42 pm by Staff
DISMISSED – Transportation of Marijuana for Sale, State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:41 pm by Staff
REDUCED TO PROBATION – Transportation and Possession of Cocaine for Sale, State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:21 am by Steven Wildberger
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF], a case that deals with the rights of small-business-owning veterans to receive benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) [official website]. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 11:42 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
State, Division of State Police, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued an important employment law decision dealing with whistleblower retaliation. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:10 am
Quarterman (06-6407), a case that deals with whether the State can execute a man who understands that he is set to receive the death penalty, but, due to his mental illness, is deluded about why the State sought execution. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am by CMS
  On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:54 pm by autumn
State, 2D10-2335, a case dealing with youthful offender status on a violation of probation. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 10:18 am by Dan Antoun
On 12 July 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Moreno v The Motor Insurers’ Bureau. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 12:30 pm
 Put an express provision in the deal that says that even though you agree to recommend a six-month sentence, "nothing herein shall prevent or in any way preclude the United States from introducing in the district court the criminal history of the defendant, including the details of these offenses, and/or supplementing the PSR to including additional facts regarding defendant's prior convictions. [read post]