Search for: "Deas v. Deas" Results 601 - 620 of 825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
(Though on this one point, the UK DEA s 18 is even less restrictive than COICA, which requires the site to be blocked to be "offering goods and services" in violation of copyright law - which is not even to a lawyer a description that sounds very much like Wikileaks.)EDIT: Commenters have pointed out that official government documents in the US, unlike in the UK do not attract copyright. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:25 am
Interstate 10 cuts east from El Paso through rocky desert terrain and then morphs into two major interstate highways which meet at a V east of Van Horn. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:49 am
However, the original eligible list had expired, preventing Ricks from being placed on a special eligible list on the basis of Deas v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:31 am by Elizabeth Dale
If this is a case involving corporations and their speech rights, think Citizens United, then we need to understand the history of legal assumptions about corporations, both in terms of the evolution of corporations law and in terms of theories of the relation of corporations to the polity (think Munn v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:34 am by Jeralyn
Gilani's presentence report which Judge Amon today authorized to be released pursuant to Giglio v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Judicial review of the DEA applied for by BT and TalkTalk is expected any time. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:12 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Search and Seizure Collective knowledge doctrine In determining whether an officer had probable cause for a warrantless search of a vehicle, information known to the DEA, which requested the stop, can be imputed to him under the collective knowledge doctrine. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm by Susan Brenner
Law enforcement subsequently searched through the contents of Roldan's Blackberry and found a picture of a DEA agent's car. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am by FDABlog HPM
An agent may telephone a pharmacy concerning a prescription for a controlled substance in schedules III through V and convey the practitioner’s otherwise valid oral prescription provided the prescriber has specified all required prescription information. 3. [read post]