Search for: "Defendant Doe 1"
Results 601 - 620
of 46,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2010, 2:31 am
Utah October 18, 2010): Although defense counsel argues that Officer Daley made a “show of force” by issuing commands at the defendant, the evidence presented at the hearing does not support this conclusion. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 6:24 am
The Court therefore rejects Whitley's argument that Summers does not apply because the vehicle was stopped a few blocks away from the Residence. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
The state's reliance on Green certainly does not provide the answer to that question. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:30 am
DeForte, not cited], defendant had standing in an office shared with others in a public employment context. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:14 am
Lipton et al, 1-17-cv-06221 (ILND February 11, 2018, Order) (Kennelly, USDJ) [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:36 am
Does 1-300, No. 10 C 6255, Slip Op. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:12 am
"Although it is true that [plaintiff] does not actively practice the patents and, therefore, does not compete with [defendant], it is also true that the longer [defendant] is allowed to engage in allegedly infringing activity, the lower the value of the patents becomes as licensing assets. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:04 am
" This offense does not allow "officers to use it as a ploy to conduct otherwise unauthorized searches. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
Defendant's consent was voluntary even though she was handcuffed. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
The fact an officer does not give a citation is not determinative of whether there was reasonable suspicion for the stop in the first place. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Thus, defendant International is not entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against it, however plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) as against defendant International. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 4:51 am
The officer in this case followed the defendant to his home suspecting that the defendant was DUI. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:30 am
After reading the above, it should be clear why the SHA-1 argument the defendant uses is befuddling and technically inaccurate. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:52 pm
Does 1-16, a case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the students have filed a reply memorandum of law in support of their motion to quash.Among other things, defendants argued:Plaintiffs .... point to this Court's granting of their ex parte request for discovery as proof of the facial validity of their claims, but this argument cannot be taken seriously. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Officers approached defendant’s house to conduct a knock and talk. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:16 am
A knock-and-talk of the home does not constitutionally require advice of rights to refuse a search. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:33 am
"[T]he fact that Tier 1 royalties would exceed Defendants' actual world selling prices in some cases does not mandate a finding that the jury's verdict lacked evidentiary support. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:42 am
The fact the search started immediately does not prove that the inventory was pretextual. [read post]
Prior Finding of Willfulness Does Not Support New Willful Infringement Claim as to Modified Products
27 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
Power Integrations Inc., 1-12-cv-00540 (DED April 23, 2015, Order) (Stark, J.) [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:03 am
The court does not credit the officer’s testimony because it was recollected only on the eve of the hearing on the motion to suppress over a year after the arrest. [read post]
