Search for: "Diamond v State"
Results 601 - 620
of 990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Macaluso v Pollack , 2010 NYSlipOp 30276(U) , Justice Diamond, Nassau County, presents an interesting story of how a case can get dismissed. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Jefferies co-authored a letter to the Guardian last Monday, stating that CFA reforms would “effectively remove the opportunity of people of ordinary means to seek redress when they have been libelled or intruded upon, or where they need to defend a libel claim”. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:34 pm
The approach in Hashem v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
In Diamond v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Lawyers » United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:20 am
” I’m not an expert on this area of law, but I do know that a district court recently upheld a similar law, in Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Quick Point Pencil, 440 US 257, 263 (1979).Diamond v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Lyle v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Diamond State Ins. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
Rossetti Marketing Ltd v Diamond Sofa Co Ltd [2011] EWHC 2482 (QB); [2011] WLR (D) 287 “Whether a party was a commercial agent within the meaning of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the member states relating to self-employed commercial agents or the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 was to be determined by reference to the terms and context of the agreement at the date it was concluded. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Of course, there really wasn't a drug checkpoint as the United State Supreme Court ruled that such checkpoints are illegal in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Equality and Human Rights Commission v Prime Minister & Ors [2011] EWHC 2401 (Admin) (03 October 2011) AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) Mahajna ( Salah ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011) Cockburn, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 2445 (Admin) (30… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:55 am
Diamond International Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
In L.M.F v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Diamond, “Never Intended to Be Applied to the White Population”: Firearms Regulation and Racial Disparity—The Redeemed South’s Legacy to a National Jurisprudence? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Metz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
Compare Diamond v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
In looking at the district court’s application of the common-law exclusions from §101 of “laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas” under Diamond v. [read post]
