Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
Direct evidence. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
Furthermore, many of Plaintiffs’ allegations were directed at the Circuit Court judgment, making them immaterial to the County’s liability. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 4:36 pm
While a few of the plaintiffs who have sued the large banks were direct purchasers, many, including the City of Baltimore, did not. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
The Plaintiff claimed to have adopted the mark "INDIA TV" since 01.12.2002. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 11:36 am
Others use terms such "plaintiff loyal" or "plaintiff focused". [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:06 am
Plaintiffs bought it, allegedly because of the following health/nutrient claims: 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
Moreover, plaintiffs allege that defendant benefitted from these purchases by selling more drink products, which plaintiffs found unsatisfactory, at a higher price. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:22 am
Providing notice to class members in a product liability action is rarely easy, as few manufacturers maintain detailed lists of the customers who purchase their products. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm
Alternatively, the plaintiffs might have defined their class as all Kansas citizens who purchased text messaging from Sprint Nextel or an alleged coconspirator. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Therefore, Plaintiffs’ trademark infringement claim will require Plaintiffs to establish a likelihood of actual confusion at the time of purchase. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:27 pm
The plaintiff's mark did not appear in the language of the advertisement. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
Plaintiff, was employed as mortgage underwriter. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Thus, in the absence of a "merits determination," or any time-related concerns, plaintiff was free to re-file her case:Even on these less typical facts, dismissal of plaintiff's first action was not without any adverse consequences, as plaintiff was required to purchase a new index number to commence this action. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:30 am
Appellee presented evidence that she purchased the Property on April 8, 2003, for $ 20,000.00. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:01 am
” Housewright stated that the laborers took direction from him, and that defendant did not even know of plaintiff being hired. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
Telaria allegedly “ended its over a decade long relationship with [Plaintiff] after it was unsuccessful in helping remove [Defendant’s] blocks,” causing a “direct loss of millions of dollars in advertising revenue. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:20 am
According to the complaints filed in the Northern District of Illinois federal court, the plaintiffs all purchased business interruption insurance policies but were denied coverage for COVID-19-related closures to their businesses. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:56 am
Nov. 30, 2020) Plaintiff WW sells exterior home remodeling products, and licenses independently owned/operated franchises to distribute them. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:14 am
Since the parties were direct competitors, disgorgement of profits would depend on: (a) the degree of certainty that the actor benefitted from the unlawful conduct; (b) the relative adequacy to the plaintiff of other remedies, including an award of damages; (c) the interests of the public in depriving the actor of unjust gains and discouraging unlawful conduct; (d) the role of the actor in bringing about the infringement or deceptive marketing; (e) any unreasonable delay by the… [read post]
26 May 2013, 7:59 pm
The plaintiff also drew attention to a South African court order directing HUL to withdraw the same advertisement aired on South African television. [read post]
